Seems counter-intuitive to me.
But maybe I’m missing something.
Inspired by stoic philosopher Epictetus, I worked through the 3-Step process (introduced in a earlier post ) to create an essential question for a US history unit on imperialism.
Step One: Select
Pick a theme, primary source and a philosopher quote aligned to the theme.
Imperialism was a hotly debated topic in the early 20th Century as Americans struggled with the challenge of how to manage countries conquered through war while at the same time honor values of freedom and self-government.
There is no better person to represent the pro-imperialist view than Indiana Senator Albert Beveridge, who believed passionately that America has a duty to spread democracy and freedom across the world. His The March of the Flag speech is a resounding endorsement of this view.
Hiding inside Beveridge’s speech are the themes of freedom and desire.
The stoic philosopher Epictetus had something to say about these themes as well:
“Freedom is secured not by the fulfilling of men’s desires, but by the removal of desire.” Epictetus
Step Two: Dissect
I looked at Epictetus’ quote carefully and found the claim being made and then articulated the counterclaims which asserted competing perspectives.
Claim: if you want freedom then stop desiring things. This seems to imply that desiring things interferes with freedom.
On the other hand…
Example Counterclaim: If you satisfy your desire, then you have more freedom to progress and try new things.
Do a quick think-aloud on the different ways your students may react to this quote…It might sound like this: Students desire things which give them a sense of status and freedom– phones for example. Students think phones give people more freedom to share and do things. It opens up possibilities. But does it? Phones steal time away from social interactions and classwork. Students feel obligated (not free) to answer every text and message that comes their way. That hardly looks like freedom.
There are lots of entry points here for students to explore the themes, which is a sure sign it will lead to a great conversation.
Step Three: Connect
Now I slow down and go back to the primary source.
I think of a question that is connected to the themes of freedom and desire, something that would be both interesting to students and at the same time intersect with Beveridge’s speech.
Is imperialism the best way to promote freedom?
- Start students with the Epictetus quote to encourage them to talk about freedom and desire in a way that connects with their lives.
- Share the Beveridge speech and the essential question. Ask students “How would Albert Beveridge answer this question? What is your evidence?
- Ask the students what they think!
Where will these discussions head? Nobody knows.
What we do know is that by combining a little philosophy and a provocative primary source, you have the seeds for a good conversation.
If you want to learn how to use this 3-step process, check out this cartoon and sign up to get Think Alouds showing you how to do it.